← Exit
/ Space navigate · n notes · f fullscreen · Esc exit

Crack the Code · Stage 4

Week 10 · Final evaluation

Evaluate your finished alarm system against the design brief and the criteria for success, and reflect on what you'd change next time.

TE4-1DPTE4-2DPTE4-DES-02TE4-PRO-01

Open this deck on the projector and press F for full-screen. N toggles speaker notes. The accompanying teacher guide is at /curriculum/crack-the-code/teacher/lessons/6.

Before this lesson:

  • Print or share the final evaluation template (with the Bloom's-taxonomy prompts).
  • Set up a showcase area — students walk around and try each other's alarms.
  • Have the marking criteria rubric open for marking conferences.
intention 2 min

Final evaluation

Evaluate your finished alarm system against the design brief and the criteria for success, and reflect on what you'd change next time.

  • Print or share the final evaluation template (with the Bloom's-taxonomy prompts).
  • Set up a showcase area — students walk around and try each other's alarms.
  • Have the marking criteria rubric open for marking conferences.
task 30 min

Today's work

  • Complete the final evaluation in the workbook: what you remember most, what was most/least enjoyable, why it matters to program control technologies, whether and how you'll use programming in future, what you did well and would do differently, what you'd do more / less / differently and why, and the most worthwhile part of Crack the Code for you.
  • Have students evaluate how their solution addresses the defined functional requirements and constraints, reflecting on their learning process using Bloom's taxonomy prompts (remembering, understanding, applying, analysing, creating, evaluating).
  • Mark the folios against the marking criteria (project management; coding & function; physical electronics; final evaluation) and provide written feedback.
check 3 min

Quick check

  • I can describe how my project meets (or doesn't meet) each of the five criteria for success.
  • I can identify two things I did well and two things I would change.
  • I can connect my learning to programming or design situations beyond this unit.
  • "Evaluation = saying I did well" — push students to be specific and objective, with evidence.
  • "If it didn't work, I failed" — separate the design from the build; a great design with a partial build still meets many criteria.
reflect 3 min

Before you pack up

If you ran this unit again, what would you keep, what would you change, and what would you add?

  • Final evaluation completed in the workbook against the Bloom's-taxonomy prompts.
  • Marking conference notes signed by student and teacher.
  • Showcase peer-feedback stickies attached to the project.

End of lesson 6

That's it.

Tomorrow / next lesson: evaluation & sharing.